Comments on: Fun With Numbers for Irrelevant Sweeps http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/ a critical take on Louisville news Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:03:04 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Tony http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-38334 Tony Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:56:17 +0000 http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/#comment-38334 Someone just pointed out to me that WDRB is very close to passing WAVE for third place? That would put WAVE in last place. Someone just pointed out to me that WDRB is very close to passing WAVE for third place? That would put WAVE in last place.

]]> By: LocalViewer http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-38329 LocalViewer Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:35:20 +0000 http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/#comment-38329 sorry, but you are wrong. flat out wrong. Check the numbers. We get 'em every day. And just wait for May when there is no March Madness. Then come calling in corrections. The rating started to slip when the show lost Kim Stevens. Track it. It's fact. sorry, but you are wrong. flat out wrong. Check the numbers. We get ‘em every day. And just wait for May when there is no March Madness. Then come calling in corrections. The rating started to slip when the show lost Kim Stevens. Track it. It’s fact.

]]> By: correction http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-38324 correction Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:26:00 +0000 http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/#comment-38324 No, actually they were a poor third on a daily basis when the lineup got jacked up, and had been for some time. No, actually they were a poor third on a daily basis when the lineup got jacked up, and had been for some time.

]]> By: LocalViewer http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-38317 LocalViewer Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:36:57 +0000 http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/#comment-38317 FOUR WHOLE DAYS??? WOWW. uncork the champagne. and yes, they've done that before. they were first before they fired the whole morning team. and it's BASKETBALL in the NUMBER one basketball market. come spew numbers at the end of May. and 32 will be right back where they've been since they screwed up their lineup...the basement. gimme a break. anyone who can't see the basketball bounce has no clue about tv ratings. FOUR WHOLE DAYS??? WOWW. uncork the champagne. and yes, they’ve done that before. they were first before they fired the whole morning team. and it’s BASKETBALL in the NUMBER one basketball market. come spew numbers at the end of May. and 32 will be right back where they’ve been since they screwed up their lineup…the basement. gimme a break. anyone who can’t see the basketball bounce has no clue about tv ratings.

]]> By: Caveman http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-38309 Caveman Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:50:15 +0000 http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/#comment-38309 If you check the numbers, you'll see 32 has won the 5 to 7 am news block 4 of the past 5 days. It's been a long, long time, if ever, since they've been winning the entire morning on a consistent basis. If you check the numbers, you’ll see 32 has won the 5 to 7 am news block 4 of the past 5 days. It’s been a long, long time, if ever, since they’ve been winning the entire morning on a consistent basis.

]]> By: Tony http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-38306 Tony Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:37:21 +0000 http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/#comment-38306 No. Not correct. WLKY is ahead of WAVE. No. Not correct.

WLKY is ahead of WAVE.

]]> By: CaveWoman http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/comment-page-1/#comment-38241 CaveWoman Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:36:31 +0000 http://thevillevoice.com/2009/03/26/fun-with-numbers-for-irrelevant-sweeps/#comment-38241 So I take it the rundown from first to last is as follows... WHAS WAVE WLKY WDRB Is that correct? So I take it the rundown from first to last is as follows…
WHAS
WAVE
WLKY
WDRB
Is that correct?

]]>