When LEO Editor Stephen George proposed the idea of summing up what’s happened to the local paper this year in a media column, I worried that there might not be enough information to fill a column. Then I started looking back over our reports here at The ‘Ville Voice, and realized I’d need more space to fit it all in.
What’s left is an item-by-item column chronicling the belt-tightening cutbacks and attempts to stay relevant by the C-J in 2008, from the launch of a revamped website to the elimination of the public editor and media critic, with lots more in between.
It all adds up to something scary — a no-win business model, with a management philosophy of constantly searching for ways to cut costs. But it’s our only daily newspaper and it’s not going anywhere - it just won’t ever again be the paper it used to be.
Here’s the piece:
Let’s face it — almost no one is happy with the corporatization of media. When corporations underperform, and boy has the Gannett Co. done that, they go into cost-cutting mode. And when tradition and quality try to stand in the way of profit, profit always wins.
That means there’s been a lot more goings than comings at the Gannett-owned Courier-Journal. One of those departures, we learned on Monday, is Tom Dorsey, the oft-critiqued media “critic,” along with a copy editor and a decent-sized chunk of the circulation department.
The copy editor, Joey Harrison, is known as the man who killed Muhammad Ali, because his photo cutline June 4 identified Lonnie Ali as a widow. Ouch.
It’s been quite the summer of discontent at Sixth and Broadway, so here’s a review chronicling the decline of the local newspaper.
Click here to read the rest…



































6 responses so far ↓
1 James // Aug 27, 2008 at 9:43 am
Is anyone really surprised over any of this? All that’s happened is that one of the best papers in the country has now been thoroughly Gannitized.
2 Cindy Lamb // Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 am
Bring back the Louisville Times!
3 DB // Aug 27, 2008 at 1:09 pm
Fire David Hawpe!
4 Steve Magruder (I, not D or R) // Aug 27, 2008 at 2:51 pm
I agree with DB. Hawpe is an embarrassment to the paper, and has been for a looooong time.
5 Derbywiz // Aug 28, 2008 at 12:47 pm
The front page of a newspaper is generally considered to be, well, on the front. The print piece on the C-J layoffs ran at the bottom of the D section, also known as Business. Should we expect a correction in next week’s LEO?
6 factchecker // Aug 29, 2008 at 7:42 pm
Actual journos probably also shake their heads at the “research” in this story.
The C-J’s glossy magazine isn’t quarterly, and Fellingham does not oversee the weekly Scene section.
Leave a Comment