The 'Ville Voice header image 1

LEO and the Culture Maven – Nevermore?

February 21st, 2007 by thevillevoice · 4 Comments

If you didn’t catch it, LEO’s renowned “Culture Maven” — C.D. Kaplan — will no longer grace the pages of LEO. Kaplan’s last regular column appeared last week, and Kaplan used it to explain his new role at the alternative weekly, where he’s held forth on various local topics for at least a decade.

Kaplan’s colorful language won’t be totally gone from LEO. He says he’s doing a regular “featurette” that he compared to his work for Emazing, that dot-com era company that used to send you e-mails every day noting stuff like important birthdays. And Kaplan’s regular Tuesday appearances on WFPK reviewing movies will continue. And he’s still going to do his Seedy K rumor bit at the paper.

The Culture Maven told me he’s got some new projects up his sleeve, but isn’t ready to elaborate on them. He said the end of his LEO column wasn’t his decision, and LEO editor Cary Stemle explained it was simply a part of an ongoing evolution of content at the newspaper.

Stemle said it’s a difficult decision to cut a column, especially with someone like Kaplan. “He’s been writing his column for many years, and as LEO continues trying to publish a great paper, we’ve decided to use the space in some other new ways,” he said. “Our focus is on telling great stories. That’s not to say CD is in any way directly related to that statement, it’s just that pages and resources are tight and finite, and we have to make difficult choices.”

LEO is an important part of Louisville, and I think Stemle is right to re-think its content. But the bottom line is that LEO’s biggest problem has been its failure to embrace technology. Its Web site is woefully inadequate, in that it lacks original content. There’s no audio, no video, no photo galleries.  It doesn’t send out e-mail alerts and doesn’t proactively attract readers. Its blog, launched last November, is not getting attention, and still hasn’t featured a paid ad.
It simply re-publishes content from the paper, and thus, it just ain’t keeping up. Until LEO puts some time, money and effort into its online product, I can’t see a promising future.

Tags: Internet · Newspaper

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Stephen George // Feb 21, 2007 at 6:05 pm

    Rick, I’m curious about the comment near the end about The Lip not getting attention. What are you basing that statement on?

  • 2 cary stemle // Feb 21, 2007 at 6:15 pm

    Based on feedback I hear from readers, our blog is getting some attention.

    Granted, our Web site needs to improve. Stay tuned.

  • 3 thevillevoice // Feb 21, 2007 at 7:14 pm

    I’m a fan of the LIP, and believe that you’re getting positive anecdotal feedback. I’m hopeful that it will grow, but it needs, for example, a way to sign up for e-mail updates. I don’t know your statistics, but I think that the traffic to it would be improved if you were to put some financial resources into the technology to drive traffic. As for content, what is there is really good — but you should have more people writing for it so there IS more content. It’s Feb. 21, and there are only six posts this month.

  • 4 Chad // Feb 1, 2008 at 10:26 pm

    Where’s any originality on the Ville Voice site that I haven’t seen anywhere else? Bunch of comments from a washed up news guy who didn’t make it big in the local media and has suddenly become an expert using Google free ads on a blog site. Running a blog makes you an expert on nothing.

google

couk